She stated that the defendant’s counsel, JB Daudu (SAN), had informed the court that he had provided sufficient facts to justify the granting of bail. He urged the court to exercise its discretion both judicially and judiciously in granting the bail.
In response, prosecution counsel Kemi Pinheiro argued that the bail application was highly incompetent, as it was filed before the arraignment. He contended that such an application should have been filed after the arraignment, but the 1st defendant’s counsel disagreed, asserting there was no legal authority to support that position.
In her ruling, Justice Maryann Anenih stated, “The bail application in question was filed on the 22nd of November, which indicates that it was submitted several days after the 1st defendant was taken into custody.” Referring to the relevant section of the ACJA, the judge noted that the law allows for a bail application to be made when a defendant has been arrested, detained, arraigned, or brought before the court.
Bello had filed his bail application on November 22nd, although he was taken into custody on November 26th and arraigned on November 27th.
The second defendant, Umar Oricha, was granted bail in the sum of N300 million with two sureties. The sureties must own property in Maitama worth at least the bond amount, and they are required to deposit the original title documents with the court. Additionally, the sureties must swear an affidavit of means and submit copies of their passports.
The court further ruled that Oricha must deposit his travel documents and be remanded in prison custody until the bail conditions are met.