One of the charges reads: “That you, Yahaya Adoza Bello, Ali Bello, Dauda Suleiman, and Abdulsalam Hudu (still at large), sometime in February 2016 in Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, conspired amongst yourselves to convert the total sum of ₦80,246,470,089.88, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of the proceeds of your unlawful activity to wit: criminal breach of trust, thereby committing an offence contrary to Section 18(a) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011, as amended.”
“For the record, my lord, I wish to apologise for any impression that the defendant refused to appear before your Lordship. He directed his former counsel to challenge the court’s jurisdiction, which led the matter up to the Supreme Court. This was not an act of disrespect but a procedural move,” Daudu said.
Read Also: NAFDAC Speaks On Alleged Registration Of ‘Lung-Cleansing Herbal Tea’ For Smokers
In further persuasion for the grant of bail, the senior counsel highlighted the defendant’s status as a two-term governor and assured the court that the defendant would appear for trial on all adjourned dates and would not jump bail.
Daudu added that having held many high-esteem positions in the legal profession, he could, “with all humility and sincerity,” assure the court of the defendant’s commitment to standing trial.
“The defendant, a two-term governor of Kogi State, holds the court in the highest regard. I assure this honourable court that he will appear for trial on all adjourned dates, barring sickness or death,” he added.
He further informed the court that he had conferred with Pinheiro, and both agreed that they would not belabour the Court further on the bail issue, having engaged in back-and-forth proceedings on the matter from the FCT High Court to the Federal High Court.
He assured the court that Bello was ready to submit to any bail conditions imposed by the court, subject to the judge’s convenience.
“I must express profound respect for my learned silk for the prosecution, Dr. Kemi Pinheiro (SAN). He shared a soft copy of the counter-affidavit before today’s proceedings, and we agreed to avoid unnecessary arguments. We urge the court to grant bail on reasonable terms and conditions,” he added.
Pinheiro, in response, relied on Rule 27(2)(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, 2023, which states: “A lawyer shall observe strictly all promises or agreements with other opposing lawyers whether oral or in writing and whether in or out of Court, and shall adhere in good faith to all agreements implied by the circumstances of the case.”
Praising the defence counsel’s professionalism, Pinheiro said: “I must acknowledge the integrity of J.B. Daudu (SAN). We have worked to streamline the proceedings and reduce the burden on your Lordship. The EFCC is a professional, not a persecutorial body. However, the decision to grant bail and its conditions are entirely at the court’s discretion,” he said.
Pinheiro also noted the defendant’s apology, adding, “Let it be on record that the defendant has apologised through his counsel.”
“Neither party will guide me on what to do. However, given the assurances by J.B. Daudu, I am inclined to grant bail. But for these assurances, my ruling might have been otherwise,” Justice Nwite stated.