Appeal Court Takes Judgement Decision On IPOB’s Proscription Appeal

The Court of Appeal in Abuja has reserved its decision on an appeal by the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) challenging its designation as a terrorist organization by the Federal Government.

“Proper findings of facts built on a meticulous evaluation of Affidavit evidence placed before the Court below, will resolve whether the activities and characters of the Appellant as clearly distinguished vide compelling exhibits placed before the Court, meet the threshold definition of terrorism acts, as contemplated under Section 2 (i) (a) (b) & (c) of the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act, 2013.

“The Appellant’s activities as contested in its written submission before the Trial Court, strongly supported by credible Affidavit evidence falls short of acts of terrorism as contemplated under Section 2 (1) (A) (B) & (C) of the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act; this submission was not considered by the Learned Trial Judge.

“The Learned trial Judge justified the granting of the Exparte Order of 20th September 2017, vide finding of facts predicated on issues he formulated suo motu, ostensibly closing his eyes to facts, as well as documents that show that the Appellant is a group of persons holding common political belief largely made up of indigenous people of Igbo extraction and other neighbouring regions merely exercising their constitutional rights to self-determination, within the bounds of relevant international instruments and conventions.

“Affidavit evidence placed before the Trial Court shows in clear terms that the Appellant does not possess any form of arms, or weapons in the exercise of their constitutionally guaranteed rights, or have any history of violence or had engaged in any form of killings; the activities of the Appellant are essentially characterized by moving in groups with cardboards and placards in their hands, singing, blowing whistles and flutes, in agitation for self-determination; these compelling facts supported by credible evidence were not evaluated by the Court below in its finding of facts.

“Activities of the Appellant as demonstrated before the lower court, is in sharp contrast with characters of notorious groups that have even used violence such as FULANI HERDSMEN (which has been declared the 4th most dangerous terrorist organization in the world), and none of these violent group has earned terrorist tag, because the President most probably considered them as possessing or professing protected political beliefs,” IPOB said.

IPOB’s lawyer, Umeh, SAN, urged the appellate court to allow the appeal, arguing that the organization was denied a fair hearing.

On the other hand, Federal Government counsel Koleosho disputed the allegation and requested the appellate court to dismiss the appeal.

After hearing both sides, the Appeal Court panel announced that it would notify the parties of the judgment date.

For More Information And News Update, Join Informant Online WhatsApp Channel With Link Below:

https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaihFajBadmT29ufud2Z

Related articles

Symptoms Of Typhoid Fever

Typhoid fever is a bacterial infection that can spread...

Portable Shows He Is A Member Of Eiye Confraternity [VIDEO]

Nigerian singer Habeeb Okikiola Badmus popularly known as Portable...

Trump Vs Harris: Who Is Leading In US Election Polls With 2 Days Left

On Saturday, US presidential candidates campaigned intensively in North...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here